Insider threat typology
Malicious, negligent/complacent, and compromised — defined and differentiated
From knowing you need a program to actually building one that works — across competing priorities, legal constraints, and technology choices.
Every insider risk program fails or succeeds at the foundation. Before the tools, before the policies, before the budget conversation — you need to know what you’re actually defending
against, and why most organizations getit wrong from day one.
In this episode, we define the three insider threat archetypes — malicious, negligent, and compromised — and explain why treating them the same is the first critical mistake. We break down the stakeholder alignment problem, the “crown jewels” gap, and what separates programs that stick from programs that stall.
Malicious, negligent/complacent, and compromised — defined and differentiated
Why insider risk demands a fundamentally different approach from external threat defense
Getting Legal, HR, IT, Finance, and other stakeholders aligned from the start
Policy, governance, detection, and response — what must be in place
Common mistakes organizations make in early program design
Where programs go wrong even when basics are covered
Founder & CEO, ITMG
Managing Director at Deloitte
Sr. Director of Information Security at New York Football Giants
Field CISO, Teramind